Insert Generic Header Here
Pricing guide would be WAY too controversial. The reason it works on message boards and such, is that not all users can edit it, and other users leaving posts on fluctuations in prices and a dedicated member or two doing the adjustments helps keep things on track. The only possible way I could see this working on a wiki, is if it were a protected page, and users leave info on the talk page regarding price fluctuations. And even at that, we would probably want one or two dedicated people involved in the pricing guide adjustments.
Also, what are we looking for in "notable guilds"? Overall GVG rank is something more easily found on The Guild Wars official website. And HoH, well 12 minute updates in game as to who wins is pretty obvious too. So I don't quite see where that section could possibly go. Constructive criticism is appreciated :D -- 
I~sk8 (T/C) 18:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- There are numerous guilds that would be called notable, and missed by your examples. [iQ] for one. Lord of all tyria 18:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please let me know what makes them notable then... because I 1) don't pvp and 2) Don't follow other guilds. -- I~sk8 (T/C) 18:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- [iQ] won 2 (?) gold capes. The problem with notable guilds is what makes you notable. Since guilds like [QQ] never won gold, which means you can't use purely that criteria. PvE guilds would be hard to do as well. Lord of all tyria 18:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Whoa whoa. Let me write the pages for these things and keep the discussions there first guys. And try to keep an open mind—♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 18:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- [iQ] won 2 (?) gold capes. The problem with notable guilds is what makes you notable. Since guilds like [QQ] never won gold, which means you can't use purely that criteria. PvE guilds would be hard to do as well. Lord of all tyria 18:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please let me know what makes them notable then... because I 1) don't pvp and 2) Don't follow other guilds. --
Gerroh also thinks anything opinion based being treated as "official" is a terribad idea. [LaZy] could be considered a notable guild, with them being huge and all, but i wouldn't want them on Gwiki. And i've never heard of [iQ] until now. Plus, a lot of "notable" HA guilds disband and create a new guild every two weeks or so, just so they can get a good laugh out of the name.--DNA 00:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
need moar links
I am checking to see what kind of link creates WantedPages. PLease don't edit this. --◄mendel► 07:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete implemented/impractical suggestions
I commented on one suggestion and as I looked through the rest, I noticed more than one is delete worthy. So should we delete them or should we keep them as a reference? Silver Sunlight 
15:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- We keep failed policies for reference, and I could understand keeping failed suggestions for the same reasons. We should categorize them and get them off the list, though. —Dr Ishmael
18:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
