Ecto[]
Considering the anon is quite persistent in adding it back, I am inclined to give the note a 1-week grace period. If no screenshots or evident effort to back the claim, I'll remove it and personally bite whoever adds it back again. Thoughts? (This is NOT an administrative decision) -User:PanSola (talk to the 
) 02:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- He just replaced glittering dust with ecto after you put the note on. I'm quite sure it's just vandalism after that.
Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 02:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- IMO, a pretty incredulous and illogical thing to add w/o proof of it happening. Jennalee 02:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think someone got a bunch of those and wanted to drive the price up. Saying it ONLY salvages to ecto is just ridiculous.Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, they already have good collector items you can trade to tho, reason enough for me to keep a stash for basic hero weapons :P Jennalee 02:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think someone got a bunch of those and wanted to drive the price up. Saying it ONLY salvages to ecto is just ridiculous.
- IMO, a pretty incredulous and illogical thing to add w/o proof of it happening. Jennalee 02:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- His actions after I reworded the note convince me that it is vandalism. However, before that happened I believe there is basis to assume good faith and thus 1RV would have applied back then. -User:PanSola (talk to the
) 02:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably. That revert war earlier just had my kinda jumpy.Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 02:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably. That revert war earlier just had my kinda jumpy.
- His actions after I reworded the note convince me that it is vandalism. However, before that happened I believe there is basis to assume good faith and thus 1RV would have applied back then. -User:PanSola (talk to the