GuildWars Wiki
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
 
yes--[[Image:Chris1645.JPG]] 21:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 
yes--[[Image:Chris1645.JPG]] 21:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 
:Actually, the Afflicted page says: "The Afflicted retain all the abilities of their former class.", which would actually go so far as to indicate they are '''''not''''' the same. It it up to the reader to decide whether they are the same or not. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3"><font color="green">Shadow</font><font color="red">crest</font></font>]] 21:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 
:Actually, the Afflicted page says: "The Afflicted retain all the abilities of their former class.", which would actually go so far as to indicate they are '''''not''''' the same. It it up to the reader to decide whether they are the same or not. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3"><font color="green">Shadow</font><font color="red">crest</font></font>]] 21:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
And that tiny bureaucratic detail is enough to dismiss all evidence to support my point? What reason is there for those FIVE names FROM THE SAME PLACE being shared between the humans and afflicted, then? The profession detail is clearly due to game mechanics, not lore.--[[User:Aptaleon Griefhaven]]

Revision as of 21:20, 14 December 2007

Hikaru is "light" in Japanese? — Skuld 11:49, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

To whom it may concern... Can i have an explanation for the revert of my changes, please? We know the Afflicted are formally human. We know many of the Afflicted came from Shing Jea Island. Hakaru, Huan, Kam, Miju and Ako are ALL names from the same quest. They appear in an area susceptable to the plague (Shing Jea). Their names are all seen again later as Afflicted bosses. ANet had to use different professions for the bosses, for elite skill distribution etc.

... Are you saying this is a coincidence?

--User:Aptaleon Griefhaven

yes--Chris1645 21:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the Afflicted page says: "The Afflicted retain all the abilities of their former class.", which would actually go so far as to indicate they are not the same. It it up to the reader to decide whether they are the same or not. --Shadowcrest 21:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

And that tiny bureaucratic detail is enough to dismiss all evidence to support my point? What reason is there for those FIVE names FROM THE SAME PLACE being shared between the humans and afflicted, then? The profession detail is clearly due to game mechanics, not lore.--User:Aptaleon Griefhaven