No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It is listed that the shard looks like an Obsidion Shard. I dont think this is correct anymore, and shoul have this note fixed. [[User:B.N|B.N]] 12:51, 22 February 2007 (CST) |
It is listed that the shard looks like an Obsidion Shard. I dont think this is correct anymore, and shoul have this note fixed. [[User:B.N|B.N]] 12:51, 22 February 2007 (CST) |
||
:It says 'similar to', not 'same'... it never has looked any different than that. — [[Image:Fin_sig.gif|User:Kyrasantae]] [[User_talk:Kyrasantae|'''<font color=#000080>kyrasantae</font>''']] 13:37, 22 February 2007 (CST) |
:It says 'similar to', not 'same'... it never has looked any different than that. — [[Image:Fin_sig.gif|User:Kyrasantae]] [[User_talk:Kyrasantae|'''<font color=#000080>kyrasantae</font>''']] 13:37, 22 February 2007 (CST) |
||
| − | ::No one who didn't take a few sharp blows in the head would take this for an Obsidian Shard... - [[User: |
+ | ::No one who didn't take a few sharp blows in the head would take this for an Obsidian Shard... - [[User:Lavvaran|Lavvaran]] 09:56, 25 February 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 15:56, 25 February 2007
Note's Error
It is listed that the shard looks like an Obsidion Shard. I dont think this is correct anymore, and shoul have this note fixed. B.N 12:51, 22 February 2007 (CST)
- It says 'similar to', not 'same'... it never has looked any different than that. —
kyrasantae 13:37, 22 February 2007 (CST)
- No one who didn't take a few sharp blows in the head would take this for an Obsidian Shard... - Lavvaran 09:56, 25 February 2007 (CST)