I've heard ingame, but not experianced it firsthand, that this spell interrupts touch skills like Vampiric Bite. - Greven 19:07, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
- I'm pretty sure it doesn't. Touch skills are "Skills", not "Attack Skills". 213.84.230.131 08:26, 25 June 2006 (CDT)
- I know the previous comment is very old, so either they changed the skill, or you misread the description. It says "attacking foes", not foes using "attack skills" - I cannot say for sure, but I think this skill can interrupt anything. Especially in PvE where mobs are generally always attacking - or using a skill you can interupt! :-) --Lefthander75 16:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- If they're using a skill that is called an 'attack', then it can be interrupted using this... :s
---Jamster--- 16:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- If they're using a skill that is called an 'attack', then it can be interrupted using this... :s
- I know the previous comment is very old, so either they changed the skill, or you misread the description. It says "attacking foes", not foes using "attack skills" - I cannot say for sure, but I think this skill can interrupt anything. Especially in PvE where mobs are generally always attacking - or using a skill you can interupt! :-) --Lefthander75 16:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Progression[]
I believe the lvl 20 in the progression should be 62, not 61, as it seems that each level increases the dmg by 2+1/3: 15 17 1/3 19 2/3 22 24 1/3 26 2/3 29 and so on to 52 1/3 54 2/3 57 59 1/3 61 2/3 ST47 18:54, 9 July 2006 (CDT)
I think that GWs rounds down for damage calculations and thus 61 2/3 would in fct be 61. This is shown by the disparity in your calculations and the figures shown in the damage table for lvls <=16