Looking for an old conversation? In chronological order:
- Archives
- Archives 2
- Archives 3
- /Archive 4
This talk page should be used to discuss thing directly relavent to the Main Page or the edit copy. For discussions regarding GuildWiki in general, please use GuildWiki Talk:Community Portal. If you have any questions that aren't relevant to a specific talk page, head over to GuildWiki:User questions and add it.
First Featured Article
We're going to be testing the waters on our partnership with GWG. What I need from you fine people is some suggestions for what to have as a 'Featured GuildWiki Article' on Guild Wars Guru. Nominate! Gravewit 16:00, 12 February 2006 (CST)
- Damage. We got original GuildWiki research done on that, beyond SonOfRah's famous results. It's a pity to see so many ppl still using SonOfRah's results (some of which aren't exactly correct) as the ultimate treatise on Damage in GuildWars. -PanSola 16:06, 12 February 2006 (CST)
- Grawl (Species) is also a good article. Animal companion too. --Rainith 16:09, 12 February 2006 (CST)
- Damage is a good article, but not the one I would suggest to first time readers. Animal companion is a better example of standart guildwiki articles (but if we go with that, stick a picture in it and update it to include the spider). Some other articles to think about:
- Guild Wars: Factions - being changed a lot, but very good information.
- Unique items list - well 1 million viewers cant be wrong.
- One of our mission articles. Usually very well done and helpful. --Xeeron 05:55, 13 February 2006 (CST)
- I like Damage but it's a bit arcane. I'd probably vote for Animal companion as it contains lots of interesting information that many people aren't aware of, I think. It may need to be protected shortly after it goes gets featured, however. Shandy 18:45, 13 February 2006 (CST)
- Damage is a good article, but not the one I would suggest to first time readers. Animal companion is a better example of standart guildwiki articles (but if we go with that, stick a picture in it and update it to include the spider). Some other articles to think about:
- Grawl (Species) is also a good article. Animal companion too. --Rainith 16:09, 12 February 2006 (CST)
Soliciting Comments
Discuss here. Gravewit 01:22, 11 February 2006 (CST)
- http://gamewikis.org/blog/2006/02/11/in-which-i-discuss-a-partnership/#respond
- The requested URL /blog/2006/02/11/in-which-i-discuss-a-partnership/ was not found on this server.
- :( I like the sound of a forum in GWG though :) — Skuld 02:50, 11 February 2006 (CST)
- I fixed the permlinks. Comment. Gravewit 04:18, 12 February 2006 (CST)
Charcatar(sp) encoding messed up
' seems to have turned to — on all pages.. ahh and â†? on the diff pages should be left arrow :( — Skuld 02:59, 11 February 2006 (CST)
- Yeah, I'm not sure what the heck that's all about. I'll have to check it out after work. Gravewit 03:09, 11 February 2006 (CST)
The disappearence of special pages
So.. I go to check the category and page link pages, but special pages seems to have been wiped: Special:Specialpages. Erk. — Skuld 03:43, 13 February 2006 (CST)
Uploading Files
I tried to upload a file (a correct file name version of Enfeebling Blood) and I got the following 'internal error': Could not copy file "/var/tmp/phpKEmZWj" to "/home/guildwiki/public_html/images/0/0c/Enfeebling_Blood.png".
Any ideas? Shandy 23:25, 13 February 2006 (CST)
talk page
Wasn't there once talk about giving Main Page/editcopy its own talk page? Was that idea shot down? --Barek 22:53, 14 February 2006 (CST)
Fourth Area color (see Main Page/editcopy )
It looks like there's some requests for a different color in the fourth square. Personally, I'm not sure why some people have a problem with two reds next to each other. Personally, I'm not opposed to the idea if someone can come up with a decent looking alternative, I just really dislike the look of the yellow square. There's got to be a better option than yellow (I think the two red looks much better than the yellow). Lets discuss rather than starting an editing war back and forth on this. --Barek 22:53, 14 February 2006 (CST)