mNo edit summary |
m (typo in Article name: Plagueborn is correct) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We don't have an article or category for Shadow weapons (bow, sword, staff and shield), we don't have a category for Eternal weaponry, we don't have one for Jade and Amber weaponry. Why would we have either (article or category) for Plagueborn weapons? If the note is that relevant, put it in the individual weapon articles. --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 20:13, 9 June 2006 (CDT) |
We don't have an article or category for Shadow weapons (bow, sword, staff and shield), we don't have a category for Eternal weaponry, we don't have one for Jade and Amber weaponry. Why would we have either (article or category) for Plagueborn weapons? If the note is that relevant, put it in the individual weapon articles. --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 20:13, 9 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
:I think it's an interesting idea to actually track weapon families. Against merge with category, because category should just be category. -{{User:PanSola/~}} 22:19, 9 June 2006 (CDT) |
:I think it's an interesting idea to actually track weapon families. Against merge with category, because category should just be category. -{{User:PanSola/~}} 22:19, 9 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
| + | ::We may keep this article, but then at least move it from "Plaugeborn" to "Plagueborn"... --[[User:Chi Li|Chi Li]] [[Image:Chi_Li.gif|Chi Li]] 05:43, 12 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 10:43, 12 June 2006
We don't have an article or category for Shadow weapons (bow, sword, staff and shield), we don't have a category for Eternal weaponry, we don't have one for Jade and Amber weaponry. Why would we have either (article or category) for Plagueborn weapons? If the note is that relevant, put it in the individual weapon articles. --Karlos 20:13, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
- I think it's an interesting idea to actually track weapon families. Against merge with category, because category should just be category. -User:PanSola (talk to the
) 22:19, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
- We may keep this article, but then at least move it from "Plaugeborn" to "Plagueborn"... --Chi Li
05:43, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- We may keep this article, but then at least move it from "Plaugeborn" to "Plagueborn"... --Chi Li