Talk: Scavenger Strike

Revision as of 21:26, 20 October 2007

Worst pet attack skill IMO. High energy cost and low conditional damage. 213.84.230.131 17:31, 19 June 2006 (CDT)

damn skippy. Brutal Strike will do arbitrarily the same amount of damage when above 50%, and twice as much damage when health is below 50%. All at the same energy cost and recharge. Anet beastmaster and pet AI division (ABPAID. its a real division, I looked it up) needs to get off the drugs.--Windjammer 22:22, 23 December 2006 (CST)

It would be great if it was "...an additional +1...12 damage for each condition target foe is suffering." Combine that with a Fragility mesmer...mmm. ~~As it is, it is a little more spammable than Brutal Strike, so~~ Perhaps it's meant to be used versus tough foes such as bosses, where it takes awhile to get down to 50% health. BM vs Rotscale, anyone? :) 24.6.147.36 23:52, 23 December 2006 (CST)

^I take that back, didn't think Brutal had such a short recharge o_O It seems like 8 seconds in PvE. Maybe here is a good place to test my new toy:

This Pet Attack has been voted as Less Able to Make Effective (LAME).

Several users of GuildWiki have formed a consensus that this Pet Attack sucks and badly needs an update from Anet.

This Pet Attack was voted as lame for the following reasons:

High energy cost
Low conditional damage
Inferior to Brutal Strike

:PEntropy 03:36, 24 December 2006 (CST)

OMFG that is funny Entropy--

Windjammer 04:08, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Thankyous, I slapped one on Power Shot also. Any more bad skills out there?! (I wish I could get it to add cats, though - it can't because it's talk page, at least that's what I think.) Entropy 04:11, 3 January 2007 (CST)

The following Improvements have been suggested for this Pet Attack. The poster believes that any of the suggestions should be adopted by ANet.

Reduce energy cost to 5.
Reduce recharge time.
Change to "...deals +X...X damage for each condition suffered by target foe".

Entropy 21:21, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Simply make this add a deep wound on top of the conditional damage, it is the main hole in the pet habilites...90.33.169.227 00:23, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

I am Certain that "Habilities" was a typo, but I like every thing about that word. -67.172.14.127 11:35, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

There's no way they didn't see that this is blatantly worse than Brutal Strike when they made it, or in the -2 AND A HALF YEARS AFTER!!- It's sad to say, but I'm pretty sure this is some kinda sick joke on their part. There's a lot of skills similar to this... Izzy is either a sadist or an idiot. 24.11.205.179 21:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :::Simply make this add a deep wound on top of the conditional damage, it is the main hole in the pet habilites...[[User:90.33.169.227|90.33.169.227]] 00:23, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
 ::::I am Certain that "Habilities" was a typo, but I like every thing about that word. -[[User:67.172.14.127|67.172.14.127]] 11:35, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
-:::::There's no way they didn't see that this is blatantly worse than Brutal Strike when they made it, or in the -2 AND A HALF YEARS AFTER!!- It's sad to say, but I'm pretty sure this is some kinda sick joke on their part. There's a lot of skills similar to this... Izzy is either a sadist or an idiot.
+:::::There's no way they didn't see that this is blatantly worse than Brutal Strike when they made it, or in the -2 AND A HALF YEARS AFTER!!- It's sad to say, but I'm pretty sure this is some kinda sick joke on their part. There's a lot of skills similar to this... Izzy is either a sadist or an idiot. [[User:24.11.205.179|24.11.205.179]] 21:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)